Neoadjuvant Degarelix Versus Triptorelin in Premenopausal Patients Who Receive Letrozole for Locally
Silvia Dellapasqua,Kathryn P. Gray, Elisabetta Mun

AUTHOR:

TIME:
2021-05-23

INFORMATION SUMMARY:

PURPOSETo evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a...

PURPOSE
To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS
Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms.

RESULTS
Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected.

CONCLUSION
In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.

Disclaimer: This article is taken from 'Silvia Dellapasqua,Kathryn P. Gray, Elisabetta Munzone. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.00296 Journal of Clinical Oncology 37, no. 5 (February 10 2019) 386-395.  PMID: 30589600' and thanks to the author's creation. If the reprint involves copyright issues, please contact us, we will deal with it for the first time, thank you! Contact number: 86-021-60951261

RELATED SUGGESTION

23
2021
05
CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--– IW-3718 Phase II data in pat...
23
2021
05
Devastating fungal disease tackled with antimicrobial and anchor ...
23
2021
05
BALTIMORE, April 28, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Novo Nordisk today anno...
23
2021
05
Premenopausal women treated with letrozole as neoadjuvant endocri...